Top6 • Toronto Blue Jays
Ball
Medium Pressure • ELI 40
Count Shift
1-0
Base / Score
Runner on 1st • 0-3
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Hold • -2.18% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Game 831513
TD Ballpark
Mar 10, 5:07 PM UTC
A chart-first postgame recap of which club handled the challenge game better, where the biggest swings landed, and what the umpire looked like by final out.
Debrief generated Mar 10, 9:42 PM
Team vs Team Outcome Recap
Total Reviews
Raw challenge volume from the completed game.
Overturn Rate
Which club actually won more of its review bets.
Late / Close Share
How much of each team’s review activity came in the game’s tightest windows.
Tonight's Review Pattern
5 reviewed pitches so far • 2 overturned
Highest Risk Split
LHP vs RHB
RHP vs LHB
50%
2 reviews
ELI 45.5
LHP vs RHB
100%
1 review
ELI 40.0
LHP vs LHB
0%
1 review
ELI 47.0
RHP vs RHB
0%
1 review
ELI 40.0
Most Targeted Pitch
Slider
3 reviews • 33% overturned
Most Active Lane
Top-R
3 reviews • 33% overturned
Scenario Timeline
Top6 • Toronto Blue Jays
Medium Pressure • ELI 40
Count Shift
1-0
Base / Score
Runner on 1st • 0-3
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Hold • -2.18% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Bot6 • Toronto Blue Jays
Medium Pressure • ELI 40
Count Shift
3-2 → Walk
Base / Score
1st and 2nd • 0-3
Count Edge
No baseline delta
Decision Read
Challenge • +0.50% EV
Review happened at the at-bat level without a tracked pitch event.
Bot7 • Toronto Blue Jays
Medium Pressure • ELI 47
Count Shift
0-1
Base / Score
Runner on 1st • 0-7
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Hold • -0.28% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Top8 • Atlanta Braves
Medium Pressure • ELI 47
Count Shift
0-1
Base / Score
Bases Empty • 0-7
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Challenge • +3.52% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Top9 • Atlanta Braves
Medium Pressure • ELI 44
Count Shift
1-1 → 2-0
Base / Score
Bases Empty • 0-7
Count Edge
-0.9 pts
Decision Read
Challenge • +0.79% EV
The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.
Narrative readout of how the review battle unfolded after the charts have established which club actually captured the value.
The Toronto Blue Jays delivered a commanding 7-0 victory over the Atlanta Braves at TD Ballpark, with the AiBS system highlighting critical ball-strike call adjustments that helped clarify key moments in an otherwise decisive game. Across five challenges, two crucial calls were overturned, both favoring changes in ball counts that subtly shifted pitch sequences in the late innings, reinforcing Toronto’s control in a game that saw limited contentious umpiring decisions overall.
Notably, in the bottom of the ninth inning, Eric Hartman’s ball call for the Braves was overturned, shifting the count from 1-1 to 2-0. Although the score was already firmly in Toronto’s favor, this adjustment underscored the importance of maintaining accuracy even in lower-leverage situations. Earlier, in the sixth inning, the Blue Jays successfully challenged a 3-2 ball call on Davis Schneider, moving the count to 4-1. This review occurred without a tracked pitch event but still affirmed the need for precision as Toronto extended their lead to 3-0 at the time.
Pitch Timeline
Mapping Decisions
Challenge Brief
Focus this rail on the call, the game-state consequence, and the decision read. Deeper model and historical context stay tucked into org view only.
Focus
Patrick Clohisy vs Brendon Little
Count Transition
0-1
Result
Call Confirmed
Recorded Challenge
Game State
Bases Empty
Top 8 • 0-7 • 2 outs
Away offense batting
Estimated Leverage
47
Pitch
Slider
Velocity
88.1 MPH
Location
0.73 x, 3.16 z
Count Before
0-1
Baseball Consequence
Review held the count at 0-1.
Comparable game states move run expectancy by +0.000 from this review state.
Decision Read
Model favored a challenge
53% overturn probability and +3.52% expected value at challenge time.
The volume of challenges was modest, with five total, of which two were overturned and three confirmed. Both teams utilized their challenge opportunities with near-equal efficiency: Toronto’s success rate was one in three, while Atlanta’s was one in two. The plate umpire ultimately saw just two of the five calls changed after review, reflecting a fairly consistent zone behind the plate. No late-and-close challenges arose, further illustrating the Blue Jays’ command throughout, particularly in innings six through nine, where most of the game’s contested moments clustered.
While pitch-location data supported all challenges, one relied on inferred coordinates, suggesting some caution in extrapolating broader strike zone trends. Still, the evidence points to measured but impactful corrections that helped reinforce Toronto’s steady dominance in the field and ultimately contributed to a clear-cut win.