Skip to main content
ABS Observatory
Live FeedUmpire StatsTeam StatsArticlesAbout

Game 831517

Pittsburgh Pirates at New York Yankees

George M. Steinbrenner Field

Mar 9, 10:35 PM UTC

Pittsburgh Pirates Logo
New York Yankees Logo
FinalSpring
Status: Complete
Matchup123456789RHEABS
Pittsburgh Pirates Logo
PIT
000031010551
Challenges remaining: 1
New York Yankees Logo
NYY
012000000362
Challenges remaining: 0

Postgame Review

ABS Game Story

A chart-first postgame recap of which club handled the challenge game better, where the biggest swings landed, and what the umpire looked like by final out.

Debrief generated Mar 10, 9:45 PM

Postgame Matchup Lens

Team vs Team Outcome Recap

NYY
PIT

Total Reviews

Raw challenge volume from the completed game.

NYY3PIT3
3
3

Overturn Rate

Which club actually won more of its review bets.

NYY33%PIT67%
33%
67%

Late / Close Share

How much of each team’s review activity came in the game’s tightest windows.

NYY0%PIT67%
0%
67%

Umpire Tonight

Tonight's Review Pattern

6 reviewed pitches so far • 3 overturned

Highest Risk Split

LHP vs RHB

LHP vs RHB

100%

3 reviews

ELI 51.7

RHP vs RHB

0%

3 reviews

ELI 65.3

Most Targeted Pitch

Changeup

2 reviews • 100% overturned

Most Active Lane

Bot-L

2 reviews • 100% overturned

Challenge Decision Value

Scenario Timeline

Top2 • New York Yankees

Called Strike

Medium Pressure • ELI 46

Overturned +46

Count Shift

2-2 → Strikeout

Base / Score

Bases Empty • Tie 0-0

Count Edge

No baseline delta

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.18% EV

Scenario Swing Index+46
Less Than 2 OutsTie Game

Review happened at the at-bat level without a tracked pitch event.

Top3 • Pittsburgh Pirates

Ball

Medium Pressure • ELI 46

Overturned +33

Count Shift

0-1 → 1-0

Base / Score

Runner on 1st • 0-1

Count Edge

-0.2 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.74% EV

Scenario Swing Index+33
Less Than 2 Outs
OVR 45%EV +0.74%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG -0.2 ptsBB +0.0 pts

The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.

Top5 • New York Yankees

Ball

High Pressure • ELI 68

Confirmed -24

Count Shift

1-2

Base / Score

2nd and 3rd • Tie 3-3

Count Edge

+0.0 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.45% EV

Scenario Swing Index-24
RISPTwo OutsTie Game
OVR 45%EV +0.45%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +0.0 ptsBB +0.0 pts

Call was confirmed after review.

Top5 • New York Yankees

Ball

High Pressure • ELI 68

Confirmed -24

Count Shift

3-2

Base / Score

Bases Empty • Tie 3-3

Count Edge

+0.0 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.35% EV

Scenario Swing Index-24
Two OutsTie Game
OVR 45%EV +0.35%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +0.0 ptsBB +0.0 pts

Call was confirmed after review.

Top7 • Pittsburgh Pirates

Called Strike

Medium Pressure • ELI 60

Confirmed -21

Count Shift

Strikeout

Base / Score

Bases Empty • 4-3

Count Edge

No baseline delta

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.63% EV

Scenario Swing Index-21
Less Than 2 OutsLate & Close

Review happened at the at-bat level without a tracked pitch event.

Top9 • Pittsburgh Pirates

Ball

Medium Pressure • ELI 63

Overturned +45

Count Shift

Strikeout → 2-2

Base / Score

Bases Empty • 5-3

Count Edge

No baseline delta

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.63% EV

Scenario Swing Index+45
Less Than 2 OutsLate & Close

The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.

Narrative Intelligence

Game Debrief

Narrative readout of how the review battle unfolded after the charts have established which club actually captured the value.

The Pittsburgh Pirates secured a 5-3 victory over the New York Yankees at George M. Steinbrenner Field, with the AiBS review system playing a meaningful role in shaping several pivotal at-bats. Of the six challenges issued, half were overturned, demonstrating a balanced effectiveness between teams in utilizing replay. The Pirates successfully contested two of three challenges, compared to the Yankees who managed one out of three, underscoring a slightly sharper challenge execution from Pittsburgh.

Key Moments

centered on adjustments to counts that directly influenced plate discipline and approach, especially in tightly contested innings. In the bottom of the second, the Yankees’ Payton Henry benefited from a strike call being overturned at an even 2-2 count early in the game, pivoting the pitch sequence to 1-3 and potentially altering his tactical response. For the Pirates, two overturned ball calls in the bottom third and ninth innings adjusted counts in their favor at crucial junctures—going from 0-1 to 1-0 and 1-3 to 2-2—contributing to extending at-bats that likely helped sustain offensive momentum in late innings.

Forensic Log

Pitch Timeline

Zone Mode
CFM3-2Four-Seam FastballCFMKKBCFM

Visual Legend

Mapping Decisions

Strike (Corrected)Ball → Strike (Won)
Ball (Corrected)Strike → Ball (Won)
ConfirmedCall Upheld (Lost)
Other OKMisc Overturned

Forensic Insights

Challenge Brief

Focus this rail on the call, the game-state consequence, and the decision read. Deeper model and historical context stay tucked into org view only.

Focus

Henry Davis vs Angel Chivilli

Count Transition

3-2

Result

Call Confirmed

Recorded Challenge

Game State

Bases Empty

Top 5 • Tie 3-3 • 2 outs

Away offense batting

Estimated Leverage

68

Pitch

Four-Seam Fastball

Velocity

97.9 MPH

Location

0.93 x, 2.23 z

Count Before

3-2

Baseball Consequence

Review held the count at 3-2.

Comparable game states move run expectancy by +0.000 from this review state.

Decision Read

Model favored a challenge

45% overturn probability and +0.35% expected value at challenge time.

The challenges were distributed across multiple innings with most occurring in the bottom halves, reflecting the Pirates’ home-field advantage during their offensive opportunities. The fact that three of the six challenges were granted overturns by the plate umpire suggests a day where the strike zone calls were sufficiently close to invite multiple reviews, though the moderate overturn rate implies a relatively consistent zone overall. Given that two challenges relied on inferred pitch locations, it’s prudent to treat zone-related conclusions conservatively, focusing instead on how count changes shaped the flow of key at-bats.

In sum, the AiBS input functioned as a nuanced factor in this contest, influencing the rhythm of plate appearances without dramatically skewing the final outcome. The Pirates’ ability to capitalize on successful challenges contributed to their offensive resilience, ultimately supporting their incremental scoring advantage in a competitive early-season matchup.

Debrief quality