Skip to main content
ABS Observatory
Live FeedUmpire StatsTeam StatsArticlesAbout

Game 831943

Oakland Athletics at Cincinnati Reds

Goodyear Ballpark

Mar 9, 8:05 PM UTC

Oakland Athletics Logo
Cincinnati Reds Logo
FinalSpring
Status: Complete
Matchup123456789RHEABS
Oakland Athletics Logo
ATH
4002003009120
Challenges remaining: 1
Cincinnati Reds Logo
CIN
2000100407122
Challenges remaining: 0

Postgame Review

ABS Game Story

A chart-first postgame recap of which club handled the challenge game better, where the biggest swings landed, and what the umpire looked like by final out.

Debrief generated Mar 10, 9:43 PM

Postgame Matchup Lens

Team vs Team Outcome Recap

CIN
ATH

Total Reviews

Raw challenge volume from the completed game.

CIN4ATH2
4
2

Overturn Rate

Which club actually won more of its review bets.

CIN50%ATH50%
50%
50%

Late / Close Share

How much of each team’s review activity came in the game’s tightest windows.

CIN25%ATH0%
25%
0%

Umpire Tonight

Tonight's Review Pattern

6 reviewed pitches so far • 3 overturned

Highest Risk Split

RHP vs RHB

RHP vs RHB

67%

3 reviews

ELI 32.3

RHP vs LHB

50%

2 reviews

ELI 34.0

LHP vs RHB

0%

1 review

ELI 65.0

Most Targeted Pitch

Four-Seam Fastball

3 reviews • 100% overturned

Most Active Lane

Bot-M

3 reviews • 67% overturned

Challenge Decision Value

Scenario Timeline

Bot1 • Oakland Athletics

Ball

Medium Pressure • ELI 40

Confirmed -14

Count Shift

2-1

Base / Score

Bases Loaded • 4-2

Count Edge

+0.0 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.15% EV

Scenario Swing Index-14
RISPLess Than 2 OutsBases Loaded
OVR 45%EV +0.15%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +0.0 ptsBB +0.0 pts

Call was confirmed after review.

Top4 • Cincinnati Reds

Called Strike

Low Pressure • ELI 33

Overturned +24

Count Shift

2-1 → 1-2

Base / Score

Bases Empty • 6-2

Count Edge

-0.9 pts

Decision Read

Hold • -1.73% EV

Scenario Swing Index+24
Two Outs
OVR 53%EV -1.73%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG -1.6 ptsBB +0.0 pts

The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.

Bot4 • Cincinnati Reds

Ball

Low Pressure • ELI 24

Overturned +17

Count Shift

0-2 → 1-1

Base / Score

Runner on 1st • 6-2

Count Edge

+1.0 pts

Decision Read

Hold • -2.69% EV

Scenario Swing Index+17
Less Than 2 Outs
OVR 45%EV -2.69%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +1.7 ptsBB +0.0 pts

The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.

Bot5 • Cincinnati Reds

Called Strike

Low Pressure • ELI 34

Confirmed -12

Count Shift

1-1

Base / Score

Runner on 2nd • 6-2

Count Edge

+0.0 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +2.26% EV

Scenario Swing Index-12
RISPLess Than 2 Outs
OVR 53%EV +2.26%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +0.0 ptsBB +0.0 pts

Call was confirmed after review.

Bot5 • Oakland Athletics

Called Strike

Low Pressure • ELI 34

Overturned +24

Count Shift

3-1 → 2-2

Base / Score

Runner on 2nd • 6-2

Count Edge

-27.7 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +1.19% EV

Scenario Swing Index+24
RISPLess Than 2 Outs
OVR 53%EV +1.19%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG -4.0 ptsBB -27.8 pts

The overturned call changed the count before the plate appearance finished.

Bot9 • Cincinnati Reds

Called Strike

High Pressure • ELI 65

Confirmed -23

Count Shift

1-2

Base / Score

Bases Empty • 9-7

Count Edge

+0.0 pts

Decision Read

Challenge • +0.16% EV

Scenario Swing Index-23
Two OutsLate & Close
OVR 53%EV +0.16%HIGH RE confidenceLOW OVR confidenceAVG +0.0 ptsBB +0.0 pts

Call was confirmed after review.

Narrative Intelligence

Game Debrief

Narrative readout of how the review battle unfolded after the charts have established which club actually captured the value.

Oakland Athletics edged the Cincinnati Reds 9-7 in a lively spring contest at Goodyear Ballpark, where the All-Baseball System (AiBS) played a notable role in several pivotal umpiring reviews. The challenge dynamic highlighted how critical strike and ball calls shaped at-bats, with a perfectly split 3-for-6 overturn rate emphasizing a balanced but impactful use of technology. AiBS helped clarify the zone during moments that directly influenced counts and potentially at-bat outcomes.

The bottom of the fourth and fifth innings emerged as the core battlegrounds for challenges. AiBS overturned two calls each inning, all affecting pitch counts at critical junctures with the Athletics leading 6-2 at those times. Notably, challenges on Ke’Bryan Hayes and Tyler Stephenson in the fourth inning corrected ball and strike calls that adjusted counts to 1-1 and 1-2, respectively, while Chad Wallach benefited from a reversed strike call that shifted a 3-1 count to 2-2 during the fifth inning. These adjustments, mostly involving close pitches verified by full pitch-location data, underscore AiBS’s utility in fine-tuning the strike zone during moments of competitive importance.

Forensic Log

Pitch Timeline

Zone Mode
CFM1-1SplitterBCFMCFMBK

Visual Legend

Mapping Decisions

Strike (Corrected)Ball → Strike (Won)
Ball (Corrected)Strike → Ball (Won)
ConfirmedCall Upheld (Lost)
Other OKMisc Overturned

Forensic Insights

Challenge Brief

Focus this rail on the call, the game-state consequence, and the decision read. Deeper model and historical context stay tucked into org view only.

Focus

Will Benson vs Brooks Kriske

Count Transition

1-1

Result

Call Confirmed

Recorded Challenge

Game State

Runner on 2nd

Bot 5 • 6-2 • 1 out

Home offense batting

Estimated Leverage

34

Pitch

Splitter

Velocity

83.0 MPH

Location

0.66 x, 1.73 z

Count Before

1-1

Baseball Consequence

Review held the count at 1-1.

Comparable game states move run expectancy by +0.000 from this review state.

Decision Read

Model favored a challenge

53% overturn probability and +2.26% expected value at challenge time.

The overall challenge rate—six total, split evenly between the two teams—reflects disciplined, situation-based use rather than an excessive reliance on review. Cincinnati’s success on overturns (2 out of 4) and Oakland’s partial success (1 out of 2) mirror a relatively even application, with neither team gaining a decisive edge from challenges. The plate umpire registered a 50% overturn rate, indicating a zone that occasionally tilted calls but was well-corrected by AiBS input.

While the data offer robust insight into review outcomes and pitch-tracking accuracy, the influence of challenges on the final close score resides within the natural ebb of spring ball. The late innings saw fewer challenges, suggesting either clearer calls or diminishing leverage situations, but the careful intervention of AiBS firmly shaped key sequences in what proved to be a high-scoring, competitive spring matchup.

Debrief quality