Top1 • San Diego Padres
Ball
Medium Pressure • ELI 62
Count Shift
2-2
Base / Score
Bases Empty • Tie 0-0
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Hold • +0.08% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Game 831947
Peoria Stadium
Mar 23, 1:10 AM UTC
A chart-first postgame recap of which club handled the challenge game better, where the biggest swings landed, and what the umpire looked like by final out.
Debrief generated Mar 25, 3:25 AM
Team vs Team Outcome Recap
Total Reviews
Raw challenge volume from the completed game.
Overturn Rate
Which club actually won more of its review bets.
One club has a trusted modeled read here while the other side is still below confidence threshold, so compare the available value carefully.
Late / Close Share
How much of each team’s review activity came in the game’s tightest windows.
One club has a trusted modeled read here while the other side is still below confidence threshold, so compare the available value carefully.
Tonight's Review Pattern
2 reviewed pitches so far • 0 overturned
Highest Risk Split
RHP vs LHB
RHP vs LHB
0%
1 review
ELI 62.0
Most Targeted Pitch
Slider
1 reviews • 0% overturned
Most Active Lane
Bot-R
1 reviews • 0% overturned
Scenario Timeline
Top1 • San Diego Padres
Medium Pressure • ELI 62
Count Shift
2-2
Base / Score
Bases Empty • Tie 0-0
Count Edge
+0.0 pts
Decision Read
Hold • +0.08% EV
Call was confirmed after review.
Bot1 • San Diego Padres
Medium Pressure • ELI 46
Count Shift
Strikeout
Base / Score
Bases Empty • Tie 0-0
Count Edge
No baseline delta
Decision Read
Hold • +0.10% EV
Review happened at the at-bat level without a tracked pitch event.
Narrative readout of how the review battle unfolded after the charts have established which club actually captured the value.
Arizona Diamondbacks at San Diego Padres ended with Arizona Diamondbacks 11, San Diego Padres 1, and the ABS layer of the game was defined by 2 total challenges with 0 overturns. San Diego Padres got the most value from review, finishing 0-for-2 on its challenges.
In Bottom 1, San Diego Padres challenged for Fernando Tatis Jr. on a Called Strike, and the review confirmed the call. In Bottom 1, San Diego Padres challenged for on a , and the review confirmed the call.
Pitch Timeline
Mapping Decisions
Challenge Brief
Focus this rail on the call, the game-state consequence, and the decision read. Deeper model and historical context stay tucked into org view only.
Focus
Fernando Tatis Jr. vs John Curtiss
Count Transition
Strikeout
Result
Call Confirmed
Recorded Challenge
Game State
Bases Empty
Bot 1 • Tie 0-0 • 0 outs
Home offense batting
Estimated Leverage
46
Pitch
Slider
Velocity
84.9 MPH
Location
0.75 x, 1.96 z
Count Before
Strikeout
Baseball Consequence
Review held the count at Strikeout.
Comparable game states move run expectancy by +0.000 from this review state.
Decision Read
Model favored holding
53% overturn probability and +0.10% expected value at challenge time.
Overall, the plate umpire had 0 calls overturned out of 2 reviews, with 2 confirmed. Pitch-location evidence was available on 2 of 2 challenges, but 1 relied on inferred coordinates, so zone takeaways should stay measured. 1 challenge locations relied on inferred coordinates, so any zone commentary should be treated as directional rather than exact. This recap used the deterministic fallback template rather than a model-written narrative, so it stays compact and evidence-based.