
Rounding the Bases...

Rounding the Bases...
Aggregated ABS challenge data across all 30 MLB clubs, emphasizing review frequency, overturn results, and late-game usage.
Biggest Mover
Boston Red Sox
Balanced profile with 80% of reviews coming in late-or-close windows and a visible trend swing.
Team Review Profiles
Who Is Moving
Recent Swings
Default Sort
Sample-adjusted success rate, so every club stays qualified without low-volume noise.
Cincinnati Reds
Success
61.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Miami Marlins
Success
58.3%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Chicago Cubs
Success
58.0%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
St. Louis Cardinals
Success
58.0%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Philadelphia Phillies
Success
57.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Detroit Tigers
Success
56.9%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Arizona Diamondbacks
Success
56.6%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Oakland Athletics
Success
55.5%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Texas Rangers
Success
54.9%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
San Diego Padres
Success
54.7%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Seattle Mariners
Success
54.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Los Angeles Dodgers
Success
54.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Kansas City Royals
Success
54.1%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Milwaukee Brewers
Success
53.8%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
New York Yankees
Success
53.3%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Colorado Rockies
Success
52.6%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Minnesota Twins
Success
52.6%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Atlanta Braves
Success
52.5%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Houston Astros
Success
51.8%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Los Angeles Angels
Success
51.8%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Boston Red Sox
Success
51.4%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Tampa Bay Rays
Success
50.5%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
San Francisco Giants
Success
50.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
New York Mets
Success
49.7%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Toronto Blue Jays
Success
49.5%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Baltimore Orioles
Success
48.8%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Washington Nationals
Success
48.2%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Cleveland Guardians
Success
48.3%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Chicago White Sox
Success
47.9%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
Pittsburgh Pirates
Success
47.6%
Rate / Game
Challenges
Late / Close
Timing
Avg Remaining
| 01 | Selective | 2.10 | 61.2% | 83% | Balanced | 1.17 | 206 | |
| 02 | Balanced | 2.37 | 58.3% | 81% | Balanced | 1.00 | 230 | |
| 03 | Balanced | 2.07 | 58.0% | 80% | Balanced | 1.13 | 205 | |
| 04 | Selective | 1.87 | 58.0% | 84% | Balanced | 1.21 | 176 | |
| 05 | Balanced | 1.93 | 57.2% | 84% | Balanced | 1.18 | 187 | |
| 06 | Balanced | 1.74 | 56.9% | 84% | Balanced | 1.25 | 167 | |
| 07 | Balanced | 1.61 | 56.6% | 84% | Balanced | 1.26 | 159 | |
| 08 | Overactive | 2.22 | 55.5% | 81% | Balanced | 1.02 | 220 | |
| 09 | Balanced | 1.67 | 54.9% | 82% | Balanced | 1.26 | 162 | |
| 10 | Balanced | 1.96 | 54.7% | 84% | Balanced | 1.07 | 192 | |
| 11 | Balanced | 1.99 | 54.2% | 86% | Balanced | 1.10 | 201 | |
| 12 | Selective | 1.77 | 54.2% | 84% | Balanced | 1.19 | 177 | |
| 13 | Balanced | 2.07 | 54.1% | 83% | Balanced | 1.05 | 207 | |
| 14 | Balanced | 2.19 | 53.8% | 83% | Balanced | 0.98 | 210 | |
| 15 | Overactive | 2.58 | 53.3% | 80% | Balanced | 0.80 | 255 | |
—MLBMLB Average | — | 2.06 | 53.1% | 83% | Balanced | — | 1.03 | 202.2 |
| 16 | Overactive | 2.49 | 52.6% | 79% | Balanced | 0.82 | 249 | |
| 17 | Overactive | 2.71 | 52.6% | 85% | Balanced | 0.72 | 268 | |
| 18 | Balanced | 2.10 | 52.5% | 84% | Balanced | 1.00 | 204 | |
| 19 | Balanced | 2.01 | 51.8% | 79% | Balanced | 1.03 | 195 | |
| 20 | Overactive | 2.24 | 51.8% | 80% | Balanced | 0.92 | 226 | |
| 21 | Balanced | 1.84 | 51.4% | 80% | Balanced | 1.11 | 175 | |
| 22 | Balanced | 2.23 | 50.5% | 83% | Balanced | 0.93 | 212 | |
| 23 | Balanced | 2.07 | 50.2% | 84% | Balanced | 0.98 | 203 | |
| 24 | Balanced | 1.95 | 49.7% | 83% | Balanced | 1.03 | 185 | |
| 25 | Balanced | 1.92 | 49.5% | 81% | Balanced | 1.04 | 184 | |
| 26 | Balanced | 1.68 | 48.8% | 89% | Balanced | 1.15 | 168 | |
| 27 | Balanced | 1.99 | 48.2% | 88% | Balanced | 0.98 | 195 | |
| 28 | Balanced | 2.28 | 48.3% | 82% | Balanced | 0.83 | 230 | |
| 29 | Overactive | 2.39 | 47.9% | 80% | Balanced | 0.77 | 234 | |
| 30 | Balanced | 1.89 | 47.6% | 88% | Balanced | 1.01 | 185 |
Milwaukee Brewers
Trending up · 2.7 pts