Texas Rangers2–1

2nd in AL WestWC RANK: 2

Texas Rangers. Full ABS challenge profile, from turning points to review usage and game-state swings.

Historical Stream

Schedule

Schedule Flow

Last 7D Last 30D Season All

Games

Challenges

Successful

Failed

Success Rate

45.2%

Season Tempo

Challenge Trajectory

Review Profile

Challenge Usage

Early (1-3)

Middle (4-6)

Late (7-9)

Offensive Approach

Team Challenge Map

29%7 CHL

33%3 CHL

0%1 CHL

67%3 CHL

43%7 CHL

67%3 CHL

50%6 CHL

Pitch locations challenged (all sides)

Trend Overview

Aggression Profile

Hitter's Eye

Challenge Rhythm Map

Challenge Pulse

Offensive

Defensive

50%

100%

—

60%

50%

33%

100%

—

100%

50%

33%

Inning Efficiency

Challenge Timing

Challenge Value Matrix

High-Pressure Share

RISP <2 Outs

19%

Avg ELI

45.2

Smart Count Gain

+2.0

Most Productive Window

RISP, <2 Outs • Hitter Ahead across 1 tracked challenges

This team is using more of its challenges before the later or tighter spots arrive.

Highest-Value Spot

Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead

2 tracked reviews with avg ELI 43.0 and +0.036 RE. This callout follows value and leverage, not pure usage volume.

Pitcher Ahead

Even Count

Hitter Ahead

Full Count

Bases Empty

Runner On

RISP, <2 Outs

RISP, 2 Outs

Bases Loaded

Cells show where this team tends to use challenges. Darker cells indicate higher estimated leverage in this sample.

Challenge Value Matrix

Review Value Summary

Challenge Results

MEDIUM confidence

High-Value Window Share

47%

Low-Value Window Share

23%

Best Review Window

Bases Loaded • Even Count

What This Means

This team has been turning a larger share of similar challenge windows into stronger review results.

Model Challenge Rate 73%Model Hold Rate 27%High-Leverage EV Share 60%Best Window EV +8.88%

Decision Windows

Where They Challenge Well Or Poorly

4 positive windows6 negative windows0 neutral windows

Best Challenge Window

Runner On • Hitter Ahead

3 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.

3 challenges-1.16% expected+1.90% realized

Shakiest Challenge Window

Bases Loaded • Even Count

1 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.

1 challenges+8.88% expected-0.40% realized

Strong Challenge Windows

Runner On • Hitter Ahead

3 challenges · 67% higher-value · 33% lower-value

+3.06%

-1.16% expected+1.90% realized67% challenge33% hold

RISP, <2 Outs • Pitcher Ahead

2 challenges · 100% higher-value · 0% lower-value

+0.52%

+0.30% expected+0.82% realized100% challenge0% hold

Runner On • Even Count

3 challenges · 67% higher-value · 67% lower-value

+0.31%

-0.65% expected-0.34% realized33% challenge67% hold

Bases Empty • Pitcher Ahead

6 challenges · 67% higher-value · 0% lower-value

+0.30%

+0.48% expected+0.78% realized83% challenge17% hold

Riskier Challenge Windows

Bases Loaded • Even Count

1 challenges · 0% higher-value · 0% lower-value

-9.28%

+8.88% expected-0.40% realized100% challenge0% hold

RISP, <2 Outs • Hitter Ahead

1 challenges · 0% higher-value · 100% lower-value

-4.43%

-3.63% expected-8.06% realized0% challenge100% hold

Runner On • Pitcher Ahead

1 challenges · 0% higher-value · 100% lower-value

-2.41%

-2.15% expected-4.56% realized0% challenge100% hold

Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead

2 challenges · 0% higher-value · 50% lower-value

-1.01%

-0.46% expected-1.47% realized50% challenge50% hold

Decision Summary

Decision Window Board

Challenge Timing

Leverage / Burn Share

High-Leverage Share0%

Early Burn Share23%

Big Spot Usage19%

Challenge Payoff

+2.0

This club has done its best realized challenge work in risp, <2 outs • hitter ahead.

Officiating History

Umpire Matchup Matrix

Jen Pawol5 Challenges

Overturned

3/5

60%

Charlie Welling4 Challenges

Overturned

1/4

25%

Ron Kulpa3 Challenges

Overturned

2/3

67%

Club Review Pattern

ABS Archetype

Team style identity will appear once challenge samples stabilize.

Timing Efficiency

Umpire Matrix

Challenge Style