Tampa Bay Rays0–2

5th in AL EastWC RANK: 10

Tampa Bay Rays. Full ABS challenge profile, from turning points to review usage and game-state swings.

Historical Stream

Schedule

Schedule Flow

Last 7D Last 30D Season All

Games

Challenges

Successful

Failed

Success Rate

45.5%

Season Tempo

Challenge Trajectory

Review Profile

Challenge Usage

Early (1-3)

Middle (4-6)

Late (7-9)

Offensive Approach

Team Challenge Map

67%3 CHL

100%1 CHL

0%1 CHL

100%1 CHL

33%3 CHL

0%1 CHL

Pitch locations challenged (all sides)

Trend Overview

Aggression Profile

Hitter's Eye

Challenge Rhythm Map

Challenge Pulse

Offensive

Defensive

—

50%

—

100%

—

100%

—

100%

Inning Efficiency

Challenge Timing

Challenge Value Matrix

High-Pressure Share

18%

RISP <2 Outs

Avg ELI

50.3

Smart Count Gain

-3.6

Most Productive Window

Runner On • Even Count across 3 tracked challenges

This team is using more of its challenges before the later or tighter spots arrive.

Highest-Value Spot

Runner On • Even Count

3 tracked reviews with avg ELI 42.0 and -0.083 RE. This callout follows value and leverage, not pure usage volume.

Pitcher Ahead

Even Count

Hitter Ahead

Full Count

Bases Empty

Runner On

RISP, <2 Outs

RISP, 2 Outs

Bases Loaded

Cells show where this team tends to use challenges. Darker cells indicate higher estimated leverage in this sample.

Challenge Value Matrix

Review Value Summary

Challenge Results

LOW confidence

High-Value Window Share

70%

Low-Value Window Share

40%

Best Review Window

Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead

What This Means

This team is building an early review profile, but the challenge-value read is still settling in.

Model Challenge Rate 50%Model Hold Rate 50%High-Leverage EV Share 50%Best Window EV +7.75%

Decision Windows

Where They Challenge Well Or Poorly

4 positive windows1 negative windows0 neutral windows

Best Challenge Window

Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead

1 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.

1 challenges+7.75% expected+14.96% realized

Shakiest Challenge Window

RISP, 2 Outs • Even Count

1 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.

1 challenges-2.39% expected-4.77% realized

Strong Challenge Windows

Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead

1 challenges · 100% higher-value · 0% lower-value

+7.21%

+7.75% expected+14.96% realized100% challenge0% hold

Runner On • Hitter Ahead

4 challenges · 75% higher-value · 50% lower-value

+3.06%

-1.60% expected+1.46% realized50% challenge50% hold

Runner On • Even Count

2 challenges · 100% higher-value · 0% lower-value

+1.49%

+1.36% expected+2.85% realized100% challenge0% hold

Bases Empty • Even Count

2 challenges · 50% higher-value · 50% lower-value

+1.41%

-1.59% expected-0.18% realized0% challenge100% hold

Riskier Challenge Windows

RISP, 2 Outs • Even Count

1 challenges · 0% higher-value · 100% lower-value

-2.38%

-2.39% expected-4.77% realized0% challenge100% hold

Decision Summary

Decision Window Board

Challenge Timing

Leverage / Burn Share

High-Leverage Share18%

Early Burn Share9%

Big Spot Usage0%

Challenge Payoff

-3.6

This club has done its best realized challenge work in runner on • even count.

Officiating History

Umpire Matchup Matrix

Jeremie Rehak3 Challenges

Overturned

1/3

33%

Chris Guccione2 Challenges

Overturned

2/2

100%

Dan Iassogna2 Challenges

Overturned

1/2

50%

Club Review Pattern

ABS Archetype

Team style identity will appear once challenge samples stabilize.

Timing Efficiency

Umpire Matrix

Challenge Style