
Rounding the Bases...

Rounding the Bases...

Miami Marlins. Full ABS challenge profile, from turning points to review usage and game-state swings.
Schedule Flow
Games
21
Challenges
52
Successful
27
Failed
25
Success Rate
51.9%
Trend Overview
Aggression Profile
Hitter's Eye
Inning Efficiency
Challenge Value Matrix
Decision Summary
Decision Window Board
Timing Efficiency
Umpire Matrix
Challenge Style
Challenge Pulse
Challenge Trajectory
Challenge Usage
Team Challenge Map
Pitch locations challenged (all sides)
Challenge Value Matrix
High-Pressure Share
10%
RISP <2 Outs
21%
Avg ELI
49.7
Smart Count Gain
+0.0
Most Productive Window
RISP, <2 Outs • Hitter Ahead across 7 tracked challenges
This team is using more of its challenges before the later or tighter spots arrive.
Highest-Value Spot
RISP, <2 Outs • Hitter Ahead
7 tracked reviews with avg ELI 45.6 and +0.163 RE. This callout follows value and leverage, not pure usage volume.
Cells show where this team tends to use challenges. Darker cells indicate higher estimated leverage in this sample.
Challenge Results
High-Value Window Share
54%
Low-Value Window Share
40%
Best Review Window
RISP, <2 Outs • Full Count
What This Means
This team has been turning a larger share of similar challenge windows into stronger review results.
Where They Challenge Well Or Poorly
Best Challenge Window
Bases Loaded • Pitcher Ahead
1 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.
Shakiest Challenge Window
Runner On • Hitter Ahead
5 reviews tracked, but this window still needs a larger trusted sample before it becomes a hard decision read.
Strong Challenge Windows
Bases Loaded • Pitcher Ahead
1 challenges · 100% higher-value · 100% lower-value
RISP, <2 Outs • Full Count
1 challenges · 100% higher-value · 0% lower-value
Runner On • Even Count
3 challenges · 67% higher-value · 67% lower-value
Bases Empty • Hitter Ahead
4 challenges · 75% higher-value · 50% lower-value
Riskier Challenge Windows
Runner On • Hitter Ahead
5 challenges · 40% higher-value · 80% lower-value
RISP, <2 Outs • Hitter Ahead
3 challenges · 67% higher-value · 33% lower-value
Bases Empty • Pitcher Ahead
9 challenges · 44% higher-value · 22% lower-value
Bases Empty • Even Count
16 challenges · 50% higher-value · 44% lower-value
Leverage / Burn Share
Challenge Payoff
+0.0
This club has done its best realized challenge work in risp, <2 outs • hitter ahead.
Umpire Matchup Matrix
ABS Archetype